Hungary, Budapest (VarosiTV)- "Full self-driving," the controversially named driver-assist feature from Tesla, may have finally met its match.  

Tesla's foil isn't a silver-haired US Senator, world class autonomous driving expert or some of the country preeminent safety advocates. They've all warned that "full self-driving" isn't really full self-driving. The technology is designed to navigate local roads with steering, braking and acceleration, but it requires an attentive human driver who's ready to take control and correct the system, which "may do the wrong thing at the worst time," Tesla warns. 

But while these critics may have the traditional bully pulpit of the Senate or other institutions, they have no real power to change any policy on their own. An actual impact may instead come from an unglamorous public agency, one that many Americans think of as only capable of offering customers long wait times: the Department of Motor Vehicles. The California DMV has become the first US government entity to formally move against the naming of "full self-driving."   

Automotive regulation has traditionally fallen to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, part of the Department of Transportation, and Congress, which can push NHTSA to regulate specific things like driver-assist technology. But NHTSA and Congress have spent recent years swept away in the excitement and lobbying surrounding a more eye-catching technology — fully autonomous vehicles.  
 

NHTSA has even exempted some robotaxis from its safety standards and describe many potential benefits of these technologies, including improved quality of life, safer roads, shorter commutes, lower energy usage and more access to jobs. It's claimed in the past that leaving  "breathing room for innovation" led to the development of technologies like air bags. Self-driving cars and trucks could, in theory, revolutionize transportation and save millions of lives if crashes become rarer, as supporters of the technology have predicted.  
 

The US House of Representatives passed a law related to self-driving cars. It hasn't acted on the more pedestrian driver-assist technologies.

NHTSA has no standards for these systems, which has effectively left automakers like Tesla to decide what's safe enough. But there are strong signs in the last year that NHTSA is shifting some of its attention to driver-assist technologies. It announced last summer,for instance, that automakers must report driver-assist crashes.  
 

NHTSA has also cited its powers to protect the public from motor vehicle risks that it received when created in 1970. 

"Given the rapid evolution of these technologies and testing of new technologies and features on publicly accessible roads, it is critical for NHTSA to exercise its robust oversight over potential safety defects, " It said. 
 

NHTSA has even taken steps toward standards for one driver-assist feature, automatic emergency braking. But the first major regulatory impact may be from that unlikely candidate, the California Department of Motor Vehicles. 

Most Americans' interactions with their own state DMV is limited to dreary, underfunded offices with long lines and beleaguered staff. Most people are there to fill out forms and pay fees for various bureaucratic duties that the agency undertakes.  
 

But that is not the entirety of the California DMV. 

It has long been a leader in regulating autonomous vehicles, largely due to the fact many companies developing autonomous vehicles are based in California. It released its own rules for testing autonomous vehicles in 2015,and hasn't backed down from conflict. 

Uber provoked the DMV in 2017 when it tested autonomous vehicles in San Francisco without a required DMV permit. The DMV revoked Uber's vehicles' registrations in response, and Uber pulled its cars from San Francisco streets. (Uber fled to the looser regulations of Arizona, but was kicked out of the state in 2018 after one of its test vehicles was involved in a high profile fatal crash. It then sold its robotaxi business in 2020.) 

Now, the California DMV is flexing the type of muscle that could force Tesla to drop the name "full self-driving," according to autonomous driving experts.